Endangered
Species Act:
Proposal pays for enforcement with public land sales.By
Scott Sonner
ASSOCIATED PRESS
An effort to reform the Endangered Species Act is under
attack because of a Republican proposal to pay for enforcement of the law by selling
federal lands.
Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt said he hopes the 1973
law can be reauthorized, but the administration opposes the funding plan. "My hope is
the leadership in the Senate will come to grips with that issue and
we can get it worked out," Babbitt said. "It gets harder in election
years, there's no question about that."
The issue is political and does not jeopardize existing
law because it does not expire, officials said."Because Congress keeps authorizing
money for us to spend, we keep going enforcing the law," said U. S. Fish and Wildlife
spokeswoman Donna Withers of Reno. "The level of funding is the question about what
the future holds, so it would be nice to resolve this."
Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., a leading defender of the act who is up for
re-election, said |
the
chances of the reforms passing this year are fading. "It won't (pass) if they don't
satisfy me." said Reid, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee senior member.
Reid and Montana Sen. Max Baucus, the top Democrat on the
committee, have provided key support in the past to the proposal offered by Republican
Sens. Dirk Kempthorne of Idaho and John Chafee of Rhode Island.
But they object tolanguage that could result in the use of
revenue from the sale of Bureau of Land Management properties to fund enforcement,
listings of species and various conservation incentives.
"I told them if that happens, I'm checking out," Reid said.
A spokesman for Kempthorne challenged Reid to find a way to pay
for the measure.
"The only question I would ask is,'What does he
suggest to fund the bill?' " Mark Snider asked. "The Democrats, I must say, did
not come up with a source of funding."
Reid said enforcement of the species act will cost $375
million over five years; he said the government makes just $2.5 million a year from the
sale of federal land. If the funding dispute is resolved, he estimates a 50-50 chance of
the Senate passing the bill.
"Time is becoming |
under
fire from both the right and left.
Private property rights groups said it gives away too much
to environmentalists.
"This proposal would set a dangerous
precedentregarding the management of our federal public lands and the amount and quality
of public land available to future generations of Americans," Debbie Sease, the
Sierra Club's legislative director, said earlier this month.
Kempthorne, chairman of the Senate Environment and public
Works subcommittee with jurisdiction over the act, is continuing to work with the
administration, Reid and others to try to work out a compromise. The funding hurdle could
scuttle the bill again this year, but Kempthorne isn't ready to throw in the towel, Snider
said.
"Sen. Kempthorne is moving forward and working to get
it scheduled on the Senate floor," he said. "At this point everybody is still
returning phone calls and seems to be working in good faith."
Babbitt also sounded hopeful.
"We made a really good start," he said.
"We've got a pretty good consensus in the Senate. If it is not this year, we'll have
to go at it again next year and work at it until we get it. We've proven the law can work.
Sooner or later we'll get it." |