| SISKIYOU DAILY NEWS
Thursday, March 19, 1998 |
|
NONE
DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY| BY
NANCY GREGG Siskiyou County Resident  o representatives of the National Marine Fisheries Service, field representatives to the elected members of U.S. congress and the State Legislature, members of the press, County Supervisors, residents of Siskiyou County, neighbors and friends: This proposed regulation that has been presented to us to protect the coho salmon is so morally inconceivable to be happening in the United States of America, that when you first hear of it you go into denial, then disbelief and shock. When you get past those reactions, there is anger and frustration. Anger and frustration can be defused when you understand exactly what the full agenda is, where it starts and the far-reaching ramifications of all the agencies and groups that are being used. Only then we can understand our part in the larger scenario and know what we need to do to correct the injustice. Let me give you the complete picture, so that you will know that this regulation consists of a series of events and what the goal is in the end. In 1972 the U. S. government put up into space a satellite that was for the detection of world mineral deposits. It was done with taxpayer money and was stated the results would be for public use. This satellite's mapping of mineral deposits was so successful that in 1975 another satellite was put up and this time classified for military use only. In 1978, the miners of the West, were deprived of the due process of law, by the use of the U. S. Forest Service as they were removed from their claims and their way of life has became one of bureaucratic red tape and restriction. At that same time there was a mining company that went up and down the Klamath River area and bought out all the claims that they could. In the Little Shasta Valley oil companies drilled test wells and capped them off telling the ranchers there was not oil or gas reserves worth bothering with, (this same scenario was used in southern California in the 1920s in regard to oil rights in that area). Shortly thereafter irrigation water was restricted and prices increased making farming and ranching operations prohibitive to continue for many. Early 1980s - the Klamath Falls area has another group put into action, the Tribal Indian council is concerned for a minute fish that has been living behind the dams and in the lakes for the last hundred years. Now they may be extinct. Water use restrictions and wetland enlargement make existing ranches of little or no value. You can't farm without water and you can't farm under water. On water you farm blue green algae so we now need to keep the lakes and levies at full capacity regardless of possible flood potential. Reclassifying the dams. Reclassification of the dams requires notification of the people of the potential dangers of dam failure. It is a real threat as these dams and levies were mostly constructed before 1940. What happens if the dams do collapse? Homes are gone, mortgages get foreclosed upon, banks sell them for pennies on the dollar and all the rights within these titles get transferred to the person buying them up at pennies on the dollar. Patented gold claims are now all secured in one buy-out. But this only would handle the Klamath River Basin. How can we enlarge area of confiscation and why? In the late 1980s the United States agreed to the mandates set forth in the United Nations Conventions and Conferences, and look at the far-reaching dangers in the implementation of their agreed upon conclusions. Such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, NAFTA Border 21and many other NAFTA subsequent |
GUEST
OPINION agreements.) When the conditions of some of these mandates were examined they had to be sold to the American people and Congress. Enter now the environmentalists and animal right activists. From their endeavors came the Wetlands Act, the Wildlands Project and, most recently, the President's promise to the protect the National Parks in Utah. His promises was to, by executive order, turn these parks over to the control of a department in the United Nations. He had told the environmentalists that this would protect their fears of destroying this park because of mining. As soon as this land was turned over to the United Nations the Dutch government had acquired the mining rights to it. 1990s - Russia announces the end of the cold war. This super power did not do this because of being a bankrupt nation. They have tremendous gold reserves as well as other minerals. They did not do it out of the goodness of their hearts. They did it by mutual agreement negotiated through the United Nations. They would concentrate on addressing issues for the Russian people, with world cooperation in their space technology, while we concentrated on reducing our quality of life to the same level as other world nations. Private property in Russia had long ago been confiscated by the state. How do we get that most basic portion of the heart and soul of the American Constitution accomplished in the United States? We know that by executive order the United States parks can be turned over to the United nations. It has been done, others will follow. Now enter another agency for the first test case: National Marine Fisheries Service. Let's read the last three lines of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution. "...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law:nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." National Marine Fisheries Service declares that they will enact a regulation that will protect the coho salmon. (At a future time it will be another agency or department of the United States government that will institute a reason for the confiscation of private lands.) This regulation states that 300 feet on either side of a river and 60 feet on either side of a stream will be fenced to KEEP OUT THE PUBLIC. Now because it is NOT for public use, as stated in the 5th amendment, NO JUST COMPENSATION is required. The fence shall be constructed by and at the expense of the property owner thereby further enacting a burden upon them and depriving them of additional 5th amendment rights. This is FRAUD by trick and device. The fraud is the confiscation of private property which was Constitutional protected, The trick is in the wording of the regulation to usurp the wording of the Constitution and the device is the fence. What is the result? Yreka, and other communities have no drinking water and over the next 30 years we would be forced into city dwelling. Large agricultural land holdings would be reclaimed by the Federal Government to protect the people's food supply....And yes, those supposed water rights which beneath them really have some of the world's largest mineral deposits would be signed of by the United States government to the world's highest bidder as they have already done with the National Park in Utah. World conflicts need our help. Send our soldiers into other sovereign countries and have them help those poor people with their differences. Yet, what happens when we might have internal differences with the agencies and bureaucracies in our government that are being |
used to
take private property from the people? Enter the United Nations troops; and they will not
consist primarily of American soldiers. Also, for the last 15 years in an agreement with
the United Nations, troops from foreign countries have been brought here and trained on U.
S. soil. These training sites are in Minnesota, Louisiana and other sites in the south
west. But they can't do this in the United States Of America? They are doing it. The meeting at the fairgrounds and the consent of the Marine Fisheries Services to be there are part of the due process we the people are guaranteed under the 5th Amendment. We are jumping through the hoops as they are being put in front of us. What happened to NAFTA agreement is being implemented - by the directives that use the bureaus and agencies of the people against the people. This fight is not about coho salmon. this is about the very existence of our United States constitutional government. You think I am wrong? I challenge each and every agency, representative, and person of the press to prove me wrong. Go back and check the directive you are operating under. Is it an Executive Order? Those of you who are in Congress and the press, stop focusing on the things you are being given to focus on, such as the President's morality. By now you should realize that if he doesn't have any discretion where his sexual behavior is concerned, he has none anywhere else. And while you are focusing your attention on this minor issue the President of the United States is giving away our national lands and confiscating private property through the use of Executive Powers. These are and should be acted upon as impeachable offences. To the members of Congress: There is provision to override an Executive Order. It has to be acted upon in 90 days. It is about time you stopped the pompous ego-feeding speeches and got back to the protection of the people and the Constitution of the United States. While you quibble over whose pork barrel is going to be cut, by Executive Orders presidents can give away the nation. How has this become possible? By the use of WE THE PEOPLE. By dividing us into miners, ranchers, environmentalists, urban dwellers needing drinking water, rural people protecting their lifestyle from nature and piece-mealing to each of us something to appease our egos and saying we are accomplishing something of importance in our government. In the end we have all lost, we have lost the United States of America and its sovereignty to the New World Order under the United Nations. When the National Marine Fisheries Service has completed its mission, they won't be needed either. The press won't be needed, the control of the people will have been accomplished and your newspapers will have about as much effect as those in Russia. You think this is far fetched? Take each one of these happenings over the last 20 years. From the lunching of OGO to the assigning of federal parks to the United Nations, to the signing of the directive under which this National Marine Fisheries Service is acting which usurps our 5th Amendment rights - and then come back and tell me I am wrong I publicly beg you, the press - in print and on the air - to investigate these happenings, from the people's perspective, not what the bureaucracies and agencies feed you. Tell me my opinions and conclusions are wrong - or tell me I am right and let the people be aware of what they must do to stop the loss of our nation. Nancy E. Gregg is a citizen of the United States of America. |